Service delivery bias a threat to equality

Former Tshwane mayor Randall Williams has revealed how the DA prioritises service delivery based on voting patterns, sparking debate on the fairness and long-term consequences of this practice in South Africa

The recent revelations by Williams have shed light on a concerning trend in South African politics: the prioritisation of service delivery based on voting patterns.

This practice, while seemingly common among political parties, raises serious questions about fairness, equality, and the future of democracy in the country.

Williams, in explaining his reasons for leaving the DA, confirmed that political parties indeed focus on areas that voted for them when prioritising service delivery. He alleged that his former party prioritised service delivery to white residents, in areas where it garnered most votes during the polls.

This revelation echoes sentiments expressed by other political figures. Following the general election on May 29, EFF leader Julius Malema said his party would no longer assist communities that did not vote for it.

“We are only going to service the voting districts that voted for the EFF. We are now choosing people who are choosing us,” he said.

Malema recounted an incident in which a community asked him to build boreholes for them, despite being in a ward won by the ANC. Malema’s response was clear: “Go where you voted, don’t come to me. If you need assistance from the EFF, vote for the EFF.”

This approach is not limited to opposition parties. The ANC’s controversial cadre deployment policy suggests a pattern of prioritising party loyalists in government positions.

However, while this approach may be common it does not make it right.

By channelling resources and basic services along political lines, it could take years before South Africans experience the equality that is so desperately needed.

The Constitution guarantees equal rights and access to services for all citizens.

It is imperative that political parties reassess their strategies and priorities. Once elected, they have a responsibility to govern for all citizens, not just those who voted for them. This shift in mindset is crucial for building a more equitable and united South Africa.

Cape Times